请问各位这个房子如何

粽子

http://www.realtor.ca/propertyDe ... p;PidKey=-829276348
% m( s$ M: Y' @
值这个价钱吗

ram

我认为房子不错。

skybird

http://www.realtor.ca/propertyDetails.aspx?propertyId=10659596&PidKey=-829276348

* ?& O$ y2 Z. M. v值这个价钱吗
粽子 发表于 2011-5-12 16:04

- S) g. _3 _( ]3 P6 i+ ]去看过这个房子，户型很怪，空间利用率不好。bonus room很小，里面都是不规则形状的布局，尖角和棱角的分割使空间凌乱又不好利用。餐厅很小，没有任何升级。地下室的空间格局难以利用。

ram

去看过这个房子，户型很怪，空间利用率不好。bonus room很小，里面都是不规则形状的布局，尖角和棱角的分割使空间凌乱又不好利用。餐厅很小，没有任何升级。地下室的空间格局难以利用。
skybird 发表于 2011-5-12 17:37

眼见为实。

健康营养站

good.worth.

icing

not bad, I like it. And the price is much lower than gov. assess value.
: g" Y4 A1 K$ D2 k8 a: V1 V4 kTax Roll: 9982751
, b" B2 h: h& ZAssessed Value: $497,000
100% Taxable: Yes
, f0 w. t* K* d: W  M- O' R100% Complete: Yes
$ R3 a8 J  b  F; m# \8 T- MNeighbourhood: Richford
* K, u- h. [3 m0 i' kProperty Type: Residential
8 v' D, _2 a) ?1 r4 y! O6 ^, ^Land Use: 100% Single Family Dwelling
Lot Size: 467.092 M2 / 5027.9 FT2 / .115 AC
- D. a, e# L( K7 x" P2 k7 hBuilding Count: 1
9 ]$ l# u1 J5 O, V+ S4 Y) \/ aYear Built, Building Class: 2000, 2 Storey With Basement
3 M- z. K, N; V- B  ~Approx Living Area: 201.4 M2 / 2167.9 FT2
(Does not include basement area or 3rd level of split level)
Basement Development: No
! H* A3 Q9 F& AGarage: Yes
Fireplace: Yes
Walkout Basement: No
; ?! _$ o. R& Q3 |/ h+ k  NAir Conditioning: No

uil

the position is something need to concern.

Stethoscope

it looks ok.

+ ~" l# v6 Z1 c. xyou better get there and have a look on ur own, then you can get something different from the pictures.