请问各位这个房子如何

粽子

http://www.realtor.ca/propertyDe ... p;PidKey=-829276348
: i& L, x6 T2 _: N3 E* }5 c
9 @7 T+ |: q) Z! s- V! G- v值这个价钱吗

ram

我认为房子不错。

skybird

http://www.realtor.ca/propertyDetails.aspx?propertyId=10659596&PidKey=-829276348

( F/ N( H/ M0 b3 K- e* Z值这个价钱吗
  K9 A, X  i  ^/ I% q粽子 发表于 2011-5-12 16:04

去看过这个房子，户型很怪，空间利用率不好。bonus room很小，里面都是不规则形状的布局，尖角和棱角的分割使空间凌乱又不好利用。餐厅很小，没有任何升级。地下室的空间格局难以利用。

ram

去看过这个房子，户型很怪，空间利用率不好。bonus room很小，里面都是不规则形状的布局，尖角和棱角的分割使空间凌乱又不好利用。餐厅很小，没有任何升级。地下室的空间格局难以利用。
skybird 发表于 2011-5-12 17:37

眼见为实。

健康营养站

good.worth.

icing

not bad, I like it. And the price is much lower than gov. assess value.
- x: ?7 i) I' T" N  u6 w+ ITax Roll: 9982751
( c/ J* f# Y8 v" x6 zAssessed Value: $497,000
100% Taxable: Yes
+ u: u0 u5 [2 Y3 T100% Complete: Yes
Neighbourhood: Richford
Property Type: Residential
Land Use: 100% Single Family Dwelling
Lot Size: 467.092 M2 / 5027.9 FT2 / .115 AC
" h- K# Y9 a8 [1 z# IBuilding Count: 1
& X8 Z: b) C- K* Z* y' wYear Built, Building Class: 2000, 2 Storey With Basement
' n  C6 I; |/ j+ K5 qApprox Living Area: 201.4 M2 / 2167.9 FT2
( F" F9 H+ h! Z( U! U(Does not include basement area or 3rd level of split level)
Basement Development: No
" I0 E, x" l7 v" B: jGarage: Yes
Fireplace: Yes
7 n. U3 |  c  y$ `) T9 DWalkout Basement: No
Air Conditioning: No

uil

the position is something need to concern.

Stethoscope

it looks ok.
8 G, S# r; a$ Z
you better get there and have a look on ur own, then you can get something different from the pictures.