请问各位这个房子如何

粽子

http://www.realtor.ca/propertyDe ... p;PidKey=-829276348
8 D$ H& x$ ~& {, Q& _! s9 L
值这个价钱吗

ram

我认为房子不错。

skybird

http://www.realtor.ca/propertyDetails.aspx?propertyId=10659596&PidKey=-829276348
' _% |# c, l  L' ^; o/ M9 c" ]2 E0 S
值这个价钱吗
粽子 发表于 2011-5-12 16:04

& k: s6 X4 @( ~8 q8 I去看过这个房子，户型很怪，空间利用率不好。bonus room很小，里面都是不规则形状的布局，尖角和棱角的分割使空间凌乱又不好利用。餐厅很小，没有任何升级。地下室的空间格局难以利用。

ram

去看过这个房子，户型很怪，空间利用率不好。bonus room很小，里面都是不规则形状的布局，尖角和棱角的分割使空间凌乱又不好利用。餐厅很小，没有任何升级。地下室的空间格局难以利用。
skybird 发表于 2011-5-12 17:37

$ D1 d$ \1 ?) n  X6 l眼见为实。

健康营养站

good.worth.

icing

not bad, I like it. And the price is much lower than gov. assess value.
& T+ `; |6 i( OTax Roll: 9982751
) I. O! d# g' zAssessed Value: $497,000
100% Taxable: Yes
+ R, [6 D3 b5 |0 m( R$ l2 J) J& B100% Complete: Yes
7 B8 f9 R' W. ^/ u  k+ FNeighbourhood: Richford
Property Type: Residential
% C( C! `) T: w* V$ o2 ~1 g& c9 ELand Use: 100% Single Family Dwelling
* x  ?$ W2 W, t2 uLot Size: 467.092 M2 / 5027.9 FT2 / .115 AC
1 I$ h) B+ X6 D4 S% YBuilding Count: 1
Year Built, Building Class: 2000, 2 Storey With Basement
Approx Living Area: 201.4 M2 / 2167.9 FT2
(Does not include basement area or 3rd level of split level)
# F9 {9 C0 Q# P* D& ^+ E3 m0 s& d( f: dBasement Development: No
Garage: Yes
Fireplace: Yes
Walkout Basement: No
4 }5 W/ l1 ]/ A: kAir Conditioning: No

uil

the position is something need to concern.

Stethoscope

it looks ok.

you better get there and have a look on ur own, then you can get something different from the pictures.