 鲜花( 21)  鸡蛋( 0)
|

楼主 |
发表于 2010-10-5 20:41
|
显示全部楼层
正好刚看到一个类似的问题在别的英文论坛:
o6 g" j# V8 i' O; b( b( ?2 a8 V* W6 D
F4 IS Vs. F2.8 non IS, 贴过来大家都评论评论。- g4 D( H( V& H" r
- b8 H$ j5 F* ?
**********************************! D3 v: D5 [1 D4 Z
Anyhow, you pose a good question - f/4 IS or f/2.8 non IS. Here are the main points:
7 Y1 {2 B C3 `& \2 B; A; Q: z6 |( X
1) The f/2.8 gives you one extra stop of hand-holding possibility, but at the cost of depth of field, whereas the 4.0 gives you 3 stops of hand-holding possibility at any aperture. Winner: f/4.. m l9 _/ X! y5 m$ B) }, @
' ]6 k4 @ @: O0 B3 y) B1 y
2) The f/2.8 gives you one extra stop of light in darkened conditions when photographing moving subjects. The f/4 doesn't. Winner: f/2.8./ r4 J7 t4 b8 O" a
9 m7 \0 A# I- {% M2 n1 Y2 n3) The f/4 is lighter and smaller. Winner f/4., j" w, {4 f- P5 b4 T* e) x4 b
/ P- Y5 C4 v+ J% D6 `2 e+ h
4) The wider aperture of the f/2.8 can offer more creative possibilities, especially when taking portraits. Winner: f/2.8.
& e6 ^$ J& K" L$ J) _
3 P2 j$ { W# Y3 y9 ?2 m5) The f/2.8 has better bokeh (creaminess of the blurred areas). Winner: f/2.8. |
|