 鲜花( 21)  鸡蛋( 0)
|

楼主 |
发表于 2010-10-5 20:41
|
显示全部楼层
正好刚看到一个类似的问题在别的英文论坛:
5 u; _5 c$ j4 v: o8 P( n* r) S5 @3 U2 ^6 x$ ]1 D- q, ^4 X- G. e
F4 IS Vs. F2.8 non IS, 贴过来大家都评论评论。
; m' h4 _6 n& h ]5 H: n: G; x7 `. \ s/ _* X3 e3 P/ F
**********************************, c& u2 @5 x {* }4 x9 o) v8 O" F
Anyhow, you pose a good question - f/4 IS or f/2.8 non IS. Here are the main points:& R, ^5 q- c! Y+ \. y
; w( ~+ V+ N. s. i3 k
1) The f/2.8 gives you one extra stop of hand-holding possibility, but at the cost of depth of field, whereas the 4.0 gives you 3 stops of hand-holding possibility at any aperture. Winner: f/4.
/ C9 r4 S' A4 w& z: M7 P9 k) c
% J$ L7 m3 a3 e1 V0 l2 H2) The f/2.8 gives you one extra stop of light in darkened conditions when photographing moving subjects. The f/4 doesn't. Winner: f/2.8.
1 K: F% d* B. l* b1 ^/ q
3 k+ |8 o9 m. s# ]% C F0 E5 |3) The f/4 is lighter and smaller. Winner f/4.
5 d! a8 w1 { I5 O" v3 D" E& c+ d# v3 T# ^
4) The wider aperture of the f/2.8 can offer more creative possibilities, especially when taking portraits. Winner: f/2.8.2 k4 n% s1 g. X. @- v$ n" ?* k
& n! u ]" |: H- M X
5) The f/2.8 has better bokeh (creaminess of the blurred areas). Winner: f/2.8. |
|