 鲜花( 21)  鸡蛋( 0)
|

楼主 |
发表于 2010-10-5 20:41
|
显示全部楼层
正好刚看到一个类似的问题在别的英文论坛:+ u. |$ O/ M+ h
' L" s$ A, \8 r+ O/ }F4 IS Vs. F2.8 non IS, 贴过来大家都评论评论。
' k2 m2 S* W/ m# Q+ A. k' T* J) r" C, ?! f z1 m
**********************************" l# d' o6 Z& ?8 N7 h8 E. T
Anyhow, you pose a good question - f/4 IS or f/2.8 non IS. Here are the main points:6 Y8 j- _7 ?( Y" ~3 b. ~9 R
5 X" M, k: P: s
1) The f/2.8 gives you one extra stop of hand-holding possibility, but at the cost of depth of field, whereas the 4.0 gives you 3 stops of hand-holding possibility at any aperture. Winner: f/4.% j) B0 ?8 p2 }. C+ X
$ S& }( b6 t+ o2) The f/2.8 gives you one extra stop of light in darkened conditions when photographing moving subjects. The f/4 doesn't. Winner: f/2.8.
- f/ w8 _* l+ T2 t( T
! n X x. e& P. `7 m! U3) The f/4 is lighter and smaller. Winner f/4.
8 p6 `0 }& P( o. a; f& ~* s7 v3 Z6 \6 y i8 |
4) The wider aperture of the f/2.8 can offer more creative possibilities, especially when taking portraits. Winner: f/2.8.: v( x6 f0 ~# o
U2 x# R n7 ]& w6 b f! {5 D5) The f/2.8 has better bokeh (creaminess of the blurred areas). Winner: f/2.8. |
|