 鲜花( 21)  鸡蛋( 0)
|

楼主 |
发表于 2010-10-5 20:41
|
显示全部楼层
正好刚看到一个类似的问题在别的英文论坛:
, h9 ?/ b2 u9 w/ w2 o" }9 v
& Z( J- }. x% i- D4 u0 p+ O5 m- QF4 IS Vs. F2.8 non IS, 贴过来大家都评论评论。
/ D% t- E) ~: q" y) Z/ ]9 D6 O, Z) H( o. F }( n N5 z
**********************************
* n5 N6 m# H1 ~1 @- TAnyhow, you pose a good question - f/4 IS or f/2.8 non IS. Here are the main points:
5 K7 |( j/ y4 `
' L- T0 O7 ?. ^) Q; k; X6 B9 H" a1) The f/2.8 gives you one extra stop of hand-holding possibility, but at the cost of depth of field, whereas the 4.0 gives you 3 stops of hand-holding possibility at any aperture. Winner: f/4.
: T) D6 t2 V: }( b3 c: s a; M* s3 L% F1 \
2) The f/2.8 gives you one extra stop of light in darkened conditions when photographing moving subjects. The f/4 doesn't. Winner: f/2.8.% e- R- S+ [* l8 N7 ^
; Z- u6 m d* H: \7 B( y% V3 `
3) The f/4 is lighter and smaller. Winner f/4.
4 W& |: d1 Y, z1 e! d0 @7 f* Y$ i2 o( D+ A9 t
4) The wider aperture of the f/2.8 can offer more creative possibilities, especially when taking portraits. Winner: f/2.8.
& N5 s3 M5 W+ C& }4 J4 A& o+ N+ B# w8 V3 m9 w" Y9 {2 Z* Q% p3 D
5) The f/2.8 has better bokeh (creaminess of the blurred areas). Winner: f/2.8. |
|