 鲜花( 21)  鸡蛋( 0)
|

楼主 |
发表于 2010-10-5 20:41
|
显示全部楼层
正好刚看到一个类似的问题在别的英文论坛:8 }( {& I5 @1 [/ _9 l" x
0 a! G- Y. Z! i5 `F4 IS Vs. F2.8 non IS, 贴过来大家都评论评论。
# H0 C* Z: a% f9 @" A. B( U# z, v9 f- B" r2 z$ B" M% Y
**********************************/ G, [7 [: |+ L, b6 ~
Anyhow, you pose a good question - f/4 IS or f/2.8 non IS. Here are the main points:
, N: ^' g: u5 i b& Z& a$ C; K2 f' O; L6 ?8 w
1) The f/2.8 gives you one extra stop of hand-holding possibility, but at the cost of depth of field, whereas the 4.0 gives you 3 stops of hand-holding possibility at any aperture. Winner: f/4.4 I9 F/ }; {! s% b2 b
& Y) U6 W( Q% A: }9 N& y* N2) The f/2.8 gives you one extra stop of light in darkened conditions when photographing moving subjects. The f/4 doesn't. Winner: f/2.8.% e0 ^3 r6 k; ^: Z
! O0 v0 C" i+ U. v
3) The f/4 is lighter and smaller. Winner f/4.
. v5 |) I0 \7 n$ f8 ^: Z1 g+ @% X, l* r {& g2 F' M0 n
4) The wider aperture of the f/2.8 can offer more creative possibilities, especially when taking portraits. Winner: f/2.8.
! K" l& P. i1 E$ z& _. q* t3 d7 B: ^+ T' g1 N1 |
5) The f/2.8 has better bokeh (creaminess of the blurred areas). Winner: f/2.8. |
|