埃德蒙顿华人社区-Edmonton China

 找回密码
 注册
查看: 1487|回复: 2

TD Bank:OVERPRICED AND OVERBUILT: CANADIAN HOUSING

[复制链接]
鲜花(0) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2009-4-8 15:01 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
老杨团队,追求完美;客户至上,服务到位!
During Canada’s “Housing Boom”, which ran roughly
" B% P6 G4 B. @, ~) }0 Hfrom 2002 to 2008, unsustainable price increases drove+ M  L9 X7 f, f- ]9 k
unsustainable levels of building. Our view is that house
. Z! _1 p, Q2 A2 {7 Nprices exceeded the value of housing that was justified by; `/ L" k' m+ q8 ]: ?! ~' e
fundamentals by approximately 9% nationwide. This( H8 X1 z* V8 q! R/ C: P
overpricing compelled a level of residential construction
' W+ }' M! J- s" Y) r. Pthat exceeded its fundamental-justified level by approximately
* G, ^7 }4 V/ q7 |12%, an excess that was exaggerated in the past/ h: `) u7 k$ P$ m* I
three years.' n/ W) ?* {. O% @0 X- Y
By “overpricing” we mean that prices detached from
% k# X$ @$ p  j: z7 u: W+ N9 Itheir fundamentals, as witnessed by a steep erosion of
' E. t; W7 x& Qaffordability. The current unwinding of house prices reflects
9 W* f2 n6 Z8 g; x' m% \: v+ kboth a cyclical downturn and a return of house prices9 L% U: S2 G. _9 ]0 p* j: ?
to fundamentally justified levels.
" p. ?) \2 S/ RWe consider “overbuilding” of two forms: “demanddriven”
7 |+ N, ~% {- Z6 x5 ^where homebuyers buy up too many houses and
4 F$ d/ T8 n& a* P" ]that this demand cannot be sustained; and “supply-driven”- C) T8 I, p: z" q4 h* h
where builders accumulate excessive inventories. Although
6 [0 o7 H/ V4 i0 Bthere is evidence of both types, we contend that Canada’s8 J; K* h, o8 u6 J
“overbuilding” was mainly of the first type, where+ d4 B) V3 p* Z# F
homebuyers pushed homebuilding to an unsustainable pitch: r8 I& M1 j. ?! m! a
that is now being rapidly reined in.
- h8 @4 ]3 z6 j  G# G8 OWhile most markets won’t face U.S.-style overhangs,0 P5 N- @8 Z9 D6 C7 J
the construction of too many new homes over the boom% P. D0 z; [6 ]5 m  S" u
means a deepened slump. This overbuilding will likely weigh; n* X" D/ \5 I* \7 U7 u: i) g
on markets over the next few years. Even as Canada recovers
7 e% G" y) d1 V8 C3 L: p) s, |7 e; Wfrom the cyclical downturn, house price growth will- E9 u5 @2 l; N6 _& u
remain choppy and new residential construction will be
; |6 u7 ~+ i% c& r' Tdampened, owing to this structural weakness. Construction2 {$ ^7 T! }& q
is now undershooting fundamentals and we expect this1 u5 ^2 C! C+ e! Z" g$ H
to persist over 2009 to 2011. We anticipate that nationwide7 \1 q) _# d/ ?2 k
residential construction will fall further to around/ M, W& h; G' j) @7 ?
125,000 starts over 2009 with a trough around 115,000 units" J: f. B4 i4 r6 u' ]0 R% R1 d  d
in the fourth quarter.( Y$ L- H* |4 y" T1 {3 M
To quantify the degree of overpricing and overbuilding,
& T, l- A1 Q1 ]) C3 p8 f( B3 _we first develop an empirical model, based on long-run2 b- t; q2 U" }3 R1 {
fundamentals of house prices and housing starts in each9 l8 I+ `; _. v+ Y% @" R9 ^
province. Affordability is the key concept behind home
9 a- V3 ~  A+ A) v; ovalues since house prices should track incomes over the
) m( t( `+ |6 l! _2 llong-run. Since homebuilders build to meet demand, we
/ N; m1 `, m$ _8 b) [- l$ M# Oregard housing prices and household formation as the drivers; t5 o$ D# z0 u, M: [
of residential construction.  M. ^% @5 h  \5 L3 z" Q+ o
To examine the degree of overbuilding, we employ a1 U6 G& R- @3 V. g' @- M
“counter-factual,” asking what level of residential construction
$ ^, e& z9 O- g2 c5 Q& [1 ]would have occurred if housing had been priced
" p/ L6 X: |: ~& |$ u: B4 R* b( Woptimally. We find that actual homebuilding exceeded this7 k8 H5 B; f* U5 U7 ?
fundamental-justified level by about 12%. Although new8 Z$ K( O6 d  M/ b6 w
units were being absorbed, homebuyers simply bought too. ?$ w5 }4 X3 w0 u7 J  a2 y
many houses at prices that exceeded fundamentals.
% x  j/ |% |4 k6 XRegionally, we see the greatest strains on the Prairies,
3 s" z, Y+ A) H1 owhere housing demand will further contract under waning9 P$ N1 |3 |' t1 o
population inflows. Saskatoon, Calgary and Edmonton are) K' _: u2 H; f- M- R
already witnessing surges in their unsold new homes at the
4 R7 H+ m: {# U3 {very time that the resale market has swung into strong
3 z" f' z/ Y  r* }& H5 Cbuyers’ territory. Homebuilding in the Atlantic provinces8 O) S$ a- ~  H' E. u, }0 {. `
has been relatively balanced but, while not plagued by structural
) o, k# p1 Z4 }+ n0 pweakness, will be singed by the downturn nonetheless.: r+ ~  R# G; L$ N5 t* j  b
Québec shows signs of strain – especially given the2 P8 ]( A7 e) X5 w+ A, E% D
strange accumulation of unabsorbed multiples on l’Île de
+ x1 D9 ~" N" k1 dMontréal – but recent building has been relatively balanced,
/ {6 r# u# t8 \' I  p) `5 P& O  y3 egiven the province’s history of under-building and low ownership
# R& n0 M$ }8 q; ^# Z+ I8 a5 ]rates. While Ontario homebuilding will reel from a* ]+ n; j, _$ w" x: u+ O5 o
cyclical downturn, the degree of structural weakness appears
2 \5 |+ O; L- s5 _% @- F4 o3 Llimited – with the important exception of the Toronto, k  V9 Y+ ~4 l1 x: D
condo market. Both in Toronto and Vancouver, historically3 ]! ?$ w1 E; ~' R" e  s) w# i+ A
high levels of apartment-style units presently under) l8 D  M0 o* I* K% c8 D6 z, N3 O
construction mean that record numbers of condos will2 u/ E& H, s/ j, S& }; H* k
reach completion during 2009. If absorption rates fall, as3 d. ^! Y/ u/ S  r+ o2 h
cyclical factors would indicate, condo inventories could
9 m: C/ ?& J2 R5 r, aspike severely – particularly in Vancouver. However, while
5 Q  ^; L6 ]4 hresidential construction in B.C. will definitely droop, we
" f3 C) [. h3 A; V; H5 v8 q' yanticipate that the West Coast will continue to benefit from
" G, s2 W  g& V2 F- k6 ninter-provincial and international migration over the coming
; }. k, D* M2 F* t3 R6 eyears, which, along with improvements in affordability,
( X9 O' t5 Y0 i6 x8 C' mwill alleviate some of the pressure from overbuilding.5 B$ l, q. R* P  [8 {
OVERPRICED AND OVERBUILT: CANADIAN HOUSING8 h! U: g9 a: ^* Y9 |
MARKET RETURNS TO FUNDAMENTALS8 H8 I" g0 ]/ ], J3 F/ D
Grant Bishop, Economist, _4 f/ r2 G! a" B8 ?% J7 y
416-982-8063
. I, m1 S& T3 ?. @* J! V1 }Pascal Gauthier, Economist
  X9 J3 r9 Z, e0 X# A- Q% i416-944-5730
, i! O+ u7 j  x. O9 T- g5 \- v
# M$ p4 ?: E4 i+ [- k9 Ehttp://www.td.com/economics/special/gb0409_housing_exec.pdf
鲜花(52) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2009-4-8 20:39 | 显示全部楼层
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

联系我们|小黑屋|手机版|Archiver|埃德蒙顿中文网

GMT-7, 2025-11-18 17:42 , Processed in 0.070327 second(s), 12 queries , Gzip On, APC On.

Powered by Discuz! X3.4

Copyright © 2001-2021, Tencent Cloud.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表