 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
During Canada’s “Housing Boom”, which ran roughly
h. G% z1 o/ V: _0 ^( pfrom 2002 to 2008, unsustainable price increases drove q: p8 b7 [8 T5 V) p8 R0 A
unsustainable levels of building. Our view is that house! _+ s% o. Z y8 H
prices exceeded the value of housing that was justified by/ A; R3 E# R, s# |1 D
fundamentals by approximately 9% nationwide. This+ A! L# P$ O( z4 l& \" |$ K$ R) D
overpricing compelled a level of residential construction; y& P9 [7 t! |1 U( Q/ A E
that exceeded its fundamental-justified level by approximately2 F) a( Z3 p/ C+ P
12%, an excess that was exaggerated in the past
- O4 ?+ Z& p, N# \6 K5 r, _9 n1 athree years." ~/ N* [$ j" Q! p7 n, q
By “overpricing” we mean that prices detached from
) {6 ?" H- ?2 b* F- qtheir fundamentals, as witnessed by a steep erosion of
: x. x' i ?* Paffordability. The current unwinding of house prices reflects
& t; X; x( N+ a+ n8 `both a cyclical downturn and a return of house prices
$ {& |; w6 o: ato fundamentally justified levels.
( I: e7 v1 \! T) [7 FWe consider “overbuilding” of two forms: “demanddriven”
6 d5 u; V6 Y% q8 C; @; S( U+ S; Dwhere homebuyers buy up too many houses and, d" L+ @7 @0 \! H3 m& \4 R
that this demand cannot be sustained; and “supply-driven”
# u6 O' t1 _5 }) w1 n0 @where builders accumulate excessive inventories. Although
4 O0 h. n9 t; dthere is evidence of both types, we contend that Canada’s$ G0 T/ Q3 L+ F" C
“overbuilding” was mainly of the first type, where
- [% T/ Y. i. o) {; Y2 Nhomebuyers pushed homebuilding to an unsustainable pitch0 ^5 }8 [- r; T
that is now being rapidly reined in.% d ^9 M7 N1 X$ g- I
While most markets won’t face U.S.-style overhangs,
' m+ J- X: J! g1 P, x8 h h1 l: Othe construction of too many new homes over the boom
" Z5 W$ ~, L9 O( ^ pmeans a deepened slump. This overbuilding will likely weigh
& O# i9 i7 v: b: l6 M. I+ uon markets over the next few years. Even as Canada recovers$ U. z9 O+ ~4 [
from the cyclical downturn, house price growth will* t' f- n) L) M
remain choppy and new residential construction will be
: i( j7 x* P" Y4 Gdampened, owing to this structural weakness. Construction/ m( M) S" T" M+ E
is now undershooting fundamentals and we expect this
+ q, o# @( M& M& wto persist over 2009 to 2011. We anticipate that nationwide
; t1 ?1 A/ M5 o* m1 k+ ?residential construction will fall further to around+ ~6 B% z9 m7 H; W! G4 g, f3 P
125,000 starts over 2009 with a trough around 115,000 units4 B1 r3 L. U% U/ x6 }/ ^
in the fourth quarter.& J! K2 M7 J7 o7 U
To quantify the degree of overpricing and overbuilding,5 ^$ Z9 h6 v; o) q9 r
we first develop an empirical model, based on long-run
7 Q4 I! a8 [' A; ~% s4 R2 o m1 Nfundamentals of house prices and housing starts in each
" W# r. D9 K+ Q Y1 L sprovince. Affordability is the key concept behind home- T3 o3 Q2 l0 I1 J \# W
values since house prices should track incomes over the6 @0 J3 t) q* H& F
long-run. Since homebuilders build to meet demand, we* Q/ V7 t( l0 k" A7 n' V
regard housing prices and household formation as the drivers' k9 V$ W7 }& D/ v/ @8 |8 {
of residential construction.
6 [, J/ e/ w( p: x; w. `) J5 LTo examine the degree of overbuilding, we employ a
" h! {, ]$ M8 M: }3 t. H“counter-factual,” asking what level of residential construction
4 ?" m" v! b1 a9 t( uwould have occurred if housing had been priced, W- x0 K9 [# K6 }' f, }1 S8 t
optimally. We find that actual homebuilding exceeded this
7 d# c7 @2 ]+ H2 }fundamental-justified level by about 12%. Although new( z2 K# w& Y2 E
units were being absorbed, homebuyers simply bought too
) a O; k/ l0 X5 Z, U# smany houses at prices that exceeded fundamentals.
. W( Q: ^& C6 B" lRegionally, we see the greatest strains on the Prairies,0 n& R" A! `$ C! r7 ?: X3 L" T
where housing demand will further contract under waning
$ j+ P5 F# K* l9 J& M/ k7 `population inflows. Saskatoon, Calgary and Edmonton are% B4 r' k; R; D$ a4 J6 R; g1 E
already witnessing surges in their unsold new homes at the- r( e2 ?- l0 Z! A: F9 v
very time that the resale market has swung into strong+ c, z7 b1 Q/ R" h$ F0 d
buyers’ territory. Homebuilding in the Atlantic provinces1 ?3 E$ N* Z& c0 n
has been relatively balanced but, while not plagued by structural b' k: A7 I! G) Y7 m. G3 i; O
weakness, will be singed by the downturn nonetheless.5 p3 ~( b! X8 \! O: R
Québec shows signs of strain – especially given the% }' [# w. c: d8 G
strange accumulation of unabsorbed multiples on l’Île de
9 R5 p8 l: i/ ~Montréal – but recent building has been relatively balanced,
$ z1 t T7 @1 q8 y2 z2 Jgiven the province’s history of under-building and low ownership
( |& h4 g8 i2 C% Crates. While Ontario homebuilding will reel from a2 R+ \7 T. O1 Q6 U$ P
cyclical downturn, the degree of structural weakness appears2 Z+ S/ b% Z: b+ v" G
limited – with the important exception of the Toronto. D% {( J; A. o& D1 h' w
condo market. Both in Toronto and Vancouver, historically( v& L/ p9 d W) r7 D7 V
high levels of apartment-style units presently under0 B; }) g% }* B% J/ x
construction mean that record numbers of condos will3 X3 B3 t* W5 n0 L' _
reach completion during 2009. If absorption rates fall, as: y8 L8 v% f3 i5 {! Y; u8 H
cyclical factors would indicate, condo inventories could4 u# U1 E' {: Q) j! @1 ?0 J
spike severely – particularly in Vancouver. However, while
: n8 a" @3 \/ H8 @/ v, Iresidential construction in B.C. will definitely droop, we
- {; w- ]" ^1 ~( v$ E3 O% X; Manticipate that the West Coast will continue to benefit from4 t( v0 ^# P: v) [+ {
inter-provincial and international migration over the coming
, v& T- c6 S0 z) ]+ [4 J; N3 Lyears, which, along with improvements in affordability,
$ {' Y9 s% A6 n- g4 `+ y7 Owill alleviate some of the pressure from overbuilding.
2 W2 n5 i! g7 ~ n: wOVERPRICED AND OVERBUILT: CANADIAN HOUSING# v3 |) [3 r; N! v
MARKET RETURNS TO FUNDAMENTALS6 b, [2 Q# f) E$ c( F
Grant Bishop, Economist7 e: {. |: r, R5 x5 D
416-982-8063! Z6 P8 ~1 {# K, e2 c4 C
Pascal Gauthier, Economist
z% T/ p6 h( N: i/ S416-944-5730 G- k5 A1 C. V' K1 F
/ M5 o6 T6 v& y2 Z' `
http://www.td.com/economics/special/gb0409_housing_exec.pdf |
|