 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
道化工亚省工厂将裁员
1 {4 `7 Z% y& p# }8 C5 fDow Chemical's Alberta facilities will see layoffs- ?) V) E! P @( d, O% |
2 z6 Y! _9 P# J: q! [
EDMONTON — Some employees at Dow Chemical’s Alberta facilities have been notified they will be laid off but the full extent of the job cuts won’t be known until late next week, a company spokesperson said Wednesday.
Y1 B: o8 Q! ?7 H! p& `! ?5 K! \4 @
8 p9 k) U( S1 O! a& SMary-Lea Crawford, public affairs manager for Dow at Fort Saskatchewan, would not say how many layoff notices have been handed out so far. 4 B% l3 D' M" O, C- E2 Q4 N
! g# n8 O W; |
The cuts are not expected to be as deep as the 11-per-cent target announced by the U.S.-based company in December, she said.
( E" y, R' U% |2 U; Z# Y* O5 V$ A- M& `# Z3 N
Dow employs about 630 people in Alberta, with 550 in Fort Saskatchewan with the balance at its Prentiss facility near Red Deer.& x1 U. t: I6 i$ p# `+ x# M8 w# \
& M. B& \& z& ~+ @2 ~* L
Dow posted weaker-than-expected fourth-quarter results on Tuesday because demand has plummeted in markets such as the construction, electronics and automotives.5 O& k. t# b9 z& i/ T4 L
! Q) u+ C5 o& \# ^Dow has tried to revamp its earnings profile over the past two years, first by announcing plans to sell a 50- per-cent stake in its cyclical basic plastics business to Kuwaiti investors for more than $9 billion. Then, in July, it announced plans to spend more than $15 billion to acquire Rohm and Haas using proceeds from the joint venture.9 ?2 y ?% e3 `) l$ a7 G* ~) z
& `! {3 q6 k7 _; V! Q' C) f
Dow’s plans faltered when Kuwait backed out of the joint venture. Rohm and Haas said its merger agreement with Dow, was not contingent on the Kuwait transaction.+ j) e/ S- H8 Q
" q- e' O4 b$ h Y/ W, H3 E7 VPhiladelphia-based Rohm and Haas sued Dow in a bid to force the deal to close. Dow filed its response to the lawsuit on Tuesday." b( @) T U- {9 M
8 s6 w+ R6 E3 y/ B; x- j
Dow argued the agreement was not binding, because it was impossible to carry out “without jeopardizing the very existence of both companies.” |
|