 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
道化工亚省工厂将裁员, U$ I/ I; y9 Z
Dow Chemical's Alberta facilities will see layoffs
0 _4 G! M2 f/ K, g. q! V- |$ e* A: p8 R3 | x% H: \
EDMONTON — Some employees at Dow Chemical’s Alberta facilities have been notified they will be laid off but the full extent of the job cuts won’t be known until late next week, a company spokesperson said Wednesday.- N3 G2 R* z: r Y$ |
# I; S7 D/ p7 s5 W, v5 ^: G; cMary-Lea Crawford, public affairs manager for Dow at Fort Saskatchewan, would not say how many layoff notices have been handed out so far. " j5 ?* s* W( e L9 `. w, L
1 I& \$ {/ h* ]) n, f$ d
The cuts are not expected to be as deep as the 11-per-cent target announced by the U.S.-based company in December, she said.
! [' @6 a3 ]/ }3 P) u3 k8 A0 c" z+ t' U0 m% Z" ?% M' W/ A
Dow employs about 630 people in Alberta, with 550 in Fort Saskatchewan with the balance at its Prentiss facility near Red Deer.8 J4 X' P d- _$ r# @( e
+ }# u6 Z+ n) E# w6 z
Dow posted weaker-than-expected fourth-quarter results on Tuesday because demand has plummeted in markets such as the construction, electronics and automotives.0 J& z# E3 Y1 N* p
- R1 q" H0 ?( U N
Dow has tried to revamp its earnings profile over the past two years, first by announcing plans to sell a 50- per-cent stake in its cyclical basic plastics business to Kuwaiti investors for more than $9 billion. Then, in July, it announced plans to spend more than $15 billion to acquire Rohm and Haas using proceeds from the joint venture.1 U+ A5 {' N2 `6 C# r8 S* v
8 Z( j6 i" V* W4 s$ ]! N
Dow’s plans faltered when Kuwait backed out of the joint venture. Rohm and Haas said its merger agreement with Dow, was not contingent on the Kuwait transaction.
2 z9 a# [$ w, i6 `. [! D9 j5 U6 Z" K4 o
Philadelphia-based Rohm and Haas sued Dow in a bid to force the deal to close. Dow filed its response to the lawsuit on Tuesday.
9 [. p/ l2 y' v: ?1 O8 t Q+ _' K' I9 y+ U* r" `9 f! V
Dow argued the agreement was not binding, because it was impossible to carry out “without jeopardizing the very existence of both companies.” |
|