 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
道化工亚省工厂将裁员
1 R9 I1 A- c% n' \3 z0 t5 l( wDow Chemical's Alberta facilities will see layoffs
; A G i' Z8 |5 M/ z- I4 A0 v/ j4 ?: e. ]+ ^' u
EDMONTON — Some employees at Dow Chemical’s Alberta facilities have been notified they will be laid off but the full extent of the job cuts won’t be known until late next week, a company spokesperson said Wednesday.
0 Z! X( o1 M3 B/ h0 {; o/ N6 K& K0 V4 a4 S
Mary-Lea Crawford, public affairs manager for Dow at Fort Saskatchewan, would not say how many layoff notices have been handed out so far.
- q- A( C: O# R/ v$ g" F6 J5 ^0 P
8 x; C. R: [2 [The cuts are not expected to be as deep as the 11-per-cent target announced by the U.S.-based company in December, she said.
) l( U# [0 |1 O1 U/ B! D
, g( k$ W: `4 FDow employs about 630 people in Alberta, with 550 in Fort Saskatchewan with the balance at its Prentiss facility near Red Deer.
. ?' ~8 Q Q1 L' b& `$ H4 p5 v2 r8 ^! D! \" V
Dow posted weaker-than-expected fourth-quarter results on Tuesday because demand has plummeted in markets such as the construction, electronics and automotives.% I& _/ g7 o/ ?2 x: ?
7 p" O# i5 \6 I' C7 i* w9 L/ lDow has tried to revamp its earnings profile over the past two years, first by announcing plans to sell a 50- per-cent stake in its cyclical basic plastics business to Kuwaiti investors for more than $9 billion. Then, in July, it announced plans to spend more than $15 billion to acquire Rohm and Haas using proceeds from the joint venture.
3 G7 A* J, m6 t$ `6 m y! j
7 c, q4 Z& } T" n2 t% D* sDow’s plans faltered when Kuwait backed out of the joint venture. Rohm and Haas said its merger agreement with Dow, was not contingent on the Kuwait transaction.
4 v; c( G$ _* L2 m, |* Q: l. o% W8 a3 Z6 g# Y) t( e. V R- U2 f1 [
Philadelphia-based Rohm and Haas sued Dow in a bid to force the deal to close. Dow filed its response to the lawsuit on Tuesday.
) k0 c( @7 I; A' Y' I! ^5 T8 d0 l7 m9 I$ L, I
Dow argued the agreement was not binding, because it was impossible to carry out “without jeopardizing the very existence of both companies.” |
|