 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
道化工亚省工厂将裁员
# t/ N! d' Q7 [/ a$ X, YDow Chemical's Alberta facilities will see layoffs. R9 l( b, D: b c: S5 f
9 v& u) C2 N3 Q) d- [/ d! _
EDMONTON — Some employees at Dow Chemical’s Alberta facilities have been notified they will be laid off but the full extent of the job cuts won’t be known until late next week, a company spokesperson said Wednesday.
0 ^- c/ a( c& T3 }
( J+ G8 N/ c0 `% gMary-Lea Crawford, public affairs manager for Dow at Fort Saskatchewan, would not say how many layoff notices have been handed out so far. 2 z5 {. z. s: C5 z
1 ?+ o2 [, ?* z* Q& q5 ]The cuts are not expected to be as deep as the 11-per-cent target announced by the U.S.-based company in December, she said.2 o7 f4 r- j P8 ] G. R
# D& G: ~" P; T3 U8 \' _/ p5 P! U/ R
Dow employs about 630 people in Alberta, with 550 in Fort Saskatchewan with the balance at its Prentiss facility near Red Deer.# i; a) Q, n) q4 G3 U- ^+ K' K
# r7 }- P. g, C/ U! k* ^; N
Dow posted weaker-than-expected fourth-quarter results on Tuesday because demand has plummeted in markets such as the construction, electronics and automotives.
) [4 K# h) v( p) x2 F Y% e
1 f2 {; J* V1 J2 W4 g1 {6 d( g$ aDow has tried to revamp its earnings profile over the past two years, first by announcing plans to sell a 50- per-cent stake in its cyclical basic plastics business to Kuwaiti investors for more than $9 billion. Then, in July, it announced plans to spend more than $15 billion to acquire Rohm and Haas using proceeds from the joint venture.
7 W9 b& B8 Y7 W; i$ i: v9 [ {/ b4 O$ s2 i: L( w$ i5 ]: y8 X
Dow’s plans faltered when Kuwait backed out of the joint venture. Rohm and Haas said its merger agreement with Dow, was not contingent on the Kuwait transaction.1 ]; y! W/ s5 d/ {
, `2 g+ i6 g" V5 F
Philadelphia-based Rohm and Haas sued Dow in a bid to force the deal to close. Dow filed its response to the lawsuit on Tuesday.& N) N& ~# t B/ k* X9 I( b2 s6 h& }
! a7 v& b6 y( n3 A& @1 P) Z- Z
Dow argued the agreement was not binding, because it was impossible to carry out “without jeopardizing the very existence of both companies.” |
|