 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 1)
|

楼主 |
发表于 2007-12-11 20:39
|
显示全部楼层
原帖由 qwyes 于 2007-12-10 23:07 发表 5 `3 R E! o" B7 L. I9 s0 D
楼主真是人家说什么,你就信什么了!
% D5 V* h7 i) M* Y' c( f( Xcorolla 被凭为十大不安全车之一. 而且没有side airbag opition,也没有ESP(Electronic Stabilization Program ). 你买的不是SUV,平时又不是offroad,哪里有雪让你陷进去?去vw.ca把 ... 3 f+ O6 h, A1 t4 d2 R$ }
& l* h2 k# q2 x! J9 E
您说的对呀,我就是听谁说得都觉得有道理, 所以听您这一说:我又把这个可爱的 GOLF 放回到 shopping choice list 来了, 反正我已经有现成的雪铲了。
8 ?# I" e9 k- F6 d. o( J' X
8 p/ o f9 P6 d! @1 S安全是我的主要考虑因素之一。其他要素有:可靠性高(故障率低,or high reliability), 经济性好。至于好多 enjoyable features, I don't care. Most of them are over enjoyable to me, almost useless.
% c" F/ I& _7 A/ B
& y. K/ }5 e3 D- R7 N7 K不过,你说的 side airbag option, Golf 好像没有选择,Corolla 的 LE Package 倒是有选, 这是真的吗?
; g; ^* Z% c% `) s f% r4 V1 ~5 [4 O s2 m8 g) `) A- q& a; g6 N
另外,“corolla 被凭为十大不安全车之一.” 可否提供一点链接信息,偶要查他个水落石出,好让自己心安理得地跟 “烤肉啦”决裂。
+ J6 c& J* T5 C. x" D2 S4 x5 Q5 L' ~' c; P3 s
关于安全,我看了下面一段话也感觉有道理 (SUV fans 一族可能要拍我了): k E7 n/ |' | [
Yes, this whole safety argument is amusing. No one questions SUVs being safe, even though they are the ultimate death traps. You are 43% more likely to die or be injured in an SUV than in any given car (yes, even a xxxx (name of a sub-compact car) in any given accident, and that's according to independent statistics from both the insurance industry and other record keepers.
1 s |% M1 e* X9 d3 V3 e
6 h x6 G2 E* G3 Z# AOr maybe you just didn't notice all the huge warning stickers in SUVs stating "driving this vehicle is not like driving an ordinary car".
% N/ s. b8 z. `
% `+ |$ N' A5 s- o9 r: P- C9 ]/ CBut it's the old Titanic argument - if it looks safe it must be safe.
4 E. l6 w7 o; L1 I; h! W: @- K) S$ O- S' Y1 t: e( m
[ 本帖最后由 望网 于 2007-12-11 20:50 编辑 ] |
|