 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 1)
|

楼主 |
发表于 2007-12-11 20:39
|
显示全部楼层
原帖由 qwyes 于 2007-12-10 23:07 发表 / c7 R2 m! B: K# p, L% @1 c
楼主真是人家说什么,你就信什么了!; C3 r7 j3 n0 M7 z1 S
corolla 被凭为十大不安全车之一. 而且没有side airbag opition,也没有ESP(Electronic Stabilization Program ). 你买的不是SUV,平时又不是offroad,哪里有雪让你陷进去?去vw.ca把 ... # `1 I, E& I; o7 \' g
& B0 r% @0 Z. A F; L* Z您说的对呀,我就是听谁说得都觉得有道理, 所以听您这一说:我又把这个可爱的 GOLF 放回到 shopping choice list 来了, 反正我已经有现成的雪铲了。
0 b9 c; M& S2 h+ B+ D, l3 F8 Y$ U% d; x! |$ z% v% U1 Q2 r
安全是我的主要考虑因素之一。其他要素有:可靠性高(故障率低,or high reliability), 经济性好。至于好多 enjoyable features, I don't care. Most of them are over enjoyable to me, almost useless.* m4 x1 h2 h$ f) \; f x! @0 N
$ c2 s0 ^/ {" F* i不过,你说的 side airbag option, Golf 好像没有选择,Corolla 的 LE Package 倒是有选, 这是真的吗?
$ L# O* G" A# X9 [
6 J; p& E- y7 C% c+ J2 l8 q8 m另外,“corolla 被凭为十大不安全车之一.” 可否提供一点链接信息,偶要查他个水落石出,好让自己心安理得地跟 “烤肉啦”决裂。# K; Q" ]2 h; t8 Z% V) R: Z
; m; ~5 d8 f3 T$ R/ Q( V: o
关于安全,我看了下面一段话也感觉有道理 (SUV fans 一族可能要拍我了):
3 i9 v7 f3 }" L& s# U, nYes, this whole safety argument is amusing. No one questions SUVs being safe, even though they are the ultimate death traps. You are 43% more likely to die or be injured in an SUV than in any given car (yes, even a xxxx (name of a sub-compact car) in any given accident, and that's according to independent statistics from both the insurance industry and other record keepers.
2 g+ L, o# M/ f% w, V0 f. j4 K0 N# x; P3 U* ]7 m8 e1 L' x7 W
Or maybe you just didn't notice all the huge warning stickers in SUVs stating "driving this vehicle is not like driving an ordinary car".6 @( y4 g1 m: C; ?8 y
5 O0 k- S0 F8 r' M8 n7 v+ }But it's the old Titanic argument - if it looks safe it must be safe.
- j1 u$ M7 Z0 Z$ }9 u+ Y! f8 P- L6 w5 M& q: Q, n
[ 本帖最后由 望网 于 2007-12-11 20:50 编辑 ] |
|