 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 1)
|

楼主 |
发表于 2007-12-11 20:39
|
显示全部楼层
原帖由 qwyes 于 2007-12-10 23:07 发表 ' n7 t3 E R6 f
楼主真是人家说什么,你就信什么了!
% l3 X3 k( K; U) C9 icorolla 被凭为十大不安全车之一. 而且没有side airbag opition,也没有ESP(Electronic Stabilization Program ). 你买的不是SUV,平时又不是offroad,哪里有雪让你陷进去?去vw.ca把 ... , K+ L- u7 T# d
5 o3 p) w. k; N+ V& M+ P2 r您说的对呀,我就是听谁说得都觉得有道理, 所以听您这一说:我又把这个可爱的 GOLF 放回到 shopping choice list 来了, 反正我已经有现成的雪铲了。
0 Z8 i- R I- H' k! O4 O6 [2 d) }& V1 c4 d V
安全是我的主要考虑因素之一。其他要素有:可靠性高(故障率低,or high reliability), 经济性好。至于好多 enjoyable features, I don't care. Most of them are over enjoyable to me, almost useless.
. G% T8 H9 f- Y; Y' X9 h# e4 @6 @6 U3 \2 ?+ T {4 y$ P/ E7 h/ j+ @
不过,你说的 side airbag option, Golf 好像没有选择,Corolla 的 LE Package 倒是有选, 这是真的吗?
. b1 ~7 r* q3 V. @ z/ ^5 k/ C! W8 ]. [! Y
另外,“corolla 被凭为十大不安全车之一.” 可否提供一点链接信息,偶要查他个水落石出,好让自己心安理得地跟 “烤肉啦”决裂。5 G% Q1 ?# v, R
2 I+ F/ E: A& p/ S7 S/ k! M/ U关于安全,我看了下面一段话也感觉有道理 (SUV fans 一族可能要拍我了):
8 D8 v" |0 G" a: a2 fYes, this whole safety argument is amusing. No one questions SUVs being safe, even though they are the ultimate death traps. You are 43% more likely to die or be injured in an SUV than in any given car (yes, even a xxxx (name of a sub-compact car) in any given accident, and that's according to independent statistics from both the insurance industry and other record keepers.4 g3 X) G" B' ~. v: ~
: L3 a; n `1 L! {- y
Or maybe you just didn't notice all the huge warning stickers in SUVs stating "driving this vehicle is not like driving an ordinary car".
* o0 z/ U% ], }3 J' x8 t, {. A U; M6 I6 h. I
But it's the old Titanic argument - if it looks safe it must be safe.; D# h f7 ?6 w4 e; p; U# @2 k
0 H* b; T7 j/ J+ D7 V" L& I! a[ 本帖最后由 望网 于 2007-12-11 20:50 编辑 ] |
|