 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 1)
|

楼主 |
发表于 2007-12-11 20:39
|
显示全部楼层
原帖由 qwyes 于 2007-12-10 23:07 发表 
N0 K) o% a) u* j5 Y/ _4 H" Z) H楼主真是人家说什么,你就信什么了!$ p$ Y) \: O5 R% w& s3 n
corolla 被凭为十大不安全车之一. 而且没有side airbag opition,也没有ESP(Electronic Stabilization Program ). 你买的不是SUV,平时又不是offroad,哪里有雪让你陷进去?去vw.ca把 ...
9 G/ x- d( @, a3 m- z8 G8 k1 `5 G6 d3 a% q% j" ^( P. A# q8 I
您说的对呀,我就是听谁说得都觉得有道理, 所以听您这一说:我又把这个可爱的 GOLF 放回到 shopping choice list 来了, 反正我已经有现成的雪铲了。
4 n4 ~# n3 w+ c h+ G7 b/ E( I8 L ^5 u( Q* |2 h
安全是我的主要考虑因素之一。其他要素有:可靠性高(故障率低,or high reliability), 经济性好。至于好多 enjoyable features, I don't care. Most of them are over enjoyable to me, almost useless.
, W3 |' O9 }4 O( K% l% s9 J3 T; P7 w
5 p( r1 T3 V9 I! r不过,你说的 side airbag option, Golf 好像没有选择,Corolla 的 LE Package 倒是有选, 这是真的吗?% s6 v& R( L% B; A# d
1 i t C- }7 t @+ Q3 Z. T
另外,“corolla 被凭为十大不安全车之一.” 可否提供一点链接信息,偶要查他个水落石出,好让自己心安理得地跟 “烤肉啦”决裂。. Z" a, A. o+ C+ P
9 x; S" V+ `& k1 M8 m关于安全,我看了下面一段话也感觉有道理 (SUV fans 一族可能要拍我了):
% |; v! w6 J V) `+ |Yes, this whole safety argument is amusing. No one questions SUVs being safe, even though they are the ultimate death traps. You are 43% more likely to die or be injured in an SUV than in any given car (yes, even a xxxx (name of a sub-compact car) in any given accident, and that's according to independent statistics from both the insurance industry and other record keepers.
8 _. V! V. g+ Q& _' r8 ]. N( d' e/ c/ t0 S$ F
Or maybe you just didn't notice all the huge warning stickers in SUVs stating "driving this vehicle is not like driving an ordinary car".
8 d, Y: i. T0 f- \) A- ?! o& A2 o# w# R
But it's the old Titanic argument - if it looks safe it must be safe.) |6 {1 D L" v; \! V$ z+ `; B
& j3 s3 B1 D- w+ [. c8 x( t[ 本帖最后由 望网 于 2007-12-11 20:50 编辑 ] |
|